Ghandi as a Person

Ghandi Statue Indian Gandhi Leader Landmar

John S. Moolakkattu has briefly stated the well-known human ecological factors in his article. He has given an introduction and outlined the description of all those factors that are contributing to the environment either it be negatively or positively. He then also mentioned the basic delineation caused by both western and eastern civilization. A connection through his writing is constructed between Gandhi and ecology plus surroundings. The written piece basically discusses how Gandhi’s views on environment emerge in the results of the basic financial structure of the third world nations. In addition to this, Moolakkattu also elaborated Gandhi’s vision and its importance with relevant ideologies and development phases of this humanitarian society. Depletion of natural resources and much more strong propagandas of market liberals are in full swing whereas, Gandhi has a mindset in full opposition to this that’s why Moolakkattu do not consider Gandhi as a complete liberal approach personality.

In this article, John S. Moolakkattu has emphasized upon several rhetorical devices to focus on Mahatma Gandhi views of the contemporary world, where he’s indulged in the environment, development, and ecology. The article clearly shows how Gandhi had widely anticipated on most of the environmental issues which we’re facing in today’s world. If we look from today’s standpoint, Gandhi cannot be appropriately viewed as a suitable strong’environmentalist’. Moolakkattu’s analysis of Gandhi’s ecology and environment contains a crucial view of prognosis and alerts. He also contemplated needs that were centered on the constraints presented by Mahatma Gandhi on his views of environmentalism together with development. According to what Moolakkattu has said as a descriptive evaluation of Gandhi as an ecologist, he had been forced to consider Gandhi’s strategy for a bio environmentalist with a tiny touch of institutionalist.

According to Gandhi,”A certain degree of physical harmony and comfort is essential, however, above a certain level, it becomes a hindrance instead of help. Therefore, the idea of creating an unlimited number of wants and satisfying them seems to be a delusion and a snare.” John. S Moolakkattu considers that Gandhi does not agree to rapid economic development, pursue short-term profits, and rise in economic criteria of the society, contributing to a better environment. The writer after analyzing the mentality of Gandhi, explains a much better version of why Gandhi had a non-market liberal strategy with undermining contexts and extracts related to him. Exemplified in the human ecological perspective, Moolakkattu also explains why Gandhi is also considered as an environmentalist seriously. He explains that Gandhi consistently views all spheres of human life in an integrated strategy that led to more attention and significance of human environmental systems.

John S. Moolakkattu views Gandhi on the grounds of environmentalism from the Southern world, particularly the developing countries and countries. Gandhi understood that his state was going through an’Empty-Belly’ phenomenon, because of which he needed to take his ecological values to a direct path. Moolakkattu used to appeal to emotion as a rhetorical tool where he announced a sense of relationship and emotions between Gandhi and his people’s well-being. Gandhi believes that discrimination, the rural-urban ratio, globalization, access to natural resources without being known as the producers, were the main causes of this decline in ecological improvement. Industrialization, economic advancement with the creation of profits, and exploitation of human lives were at odds for Gandhi.

Moolakkattu’s explanation of Gandhi’s ideology shows that Gandhi was a man against colonization and European direct together with British empowerment in the industrial and economic sector in South Asia. The ways through which the western area of the planet is trying to persuade while spending billions of dollars by establishing businesses and productivity houses in common areas of South Asia and in countries with low market indicates that Gandhi’s forecast of this is somehow becoming a truth. Gandhi was heavily influenced by Buddhism and Jainism. The reason for his influence was the representation of nature as a living thing. There were several western thinkers with anomalous philosophies about human and environment that frightened Gandhi and led his moment of consciousness towards building a relationship between human and environment because, without people, the environment may not exist in any form.

Critically if analyzed, Gandhi possesses a moderate and neutral way of approach when considering the environment. This article clearly expresses Gandhi’s views on environmentalism, however, a better image of Gandhi’s perspective could have been shown if more statistics and graphics were used. There needs to be proper in-text and out-text related citations and links to references which may help the reader and audience to develop a sense of harmonic balance between Gandhi’s bio-environmentalist and institutionalist sides. The writer should have taken this into account that Gandhi’s non-market liberal strategy might have been more effectively made by using shreds of evidence from Gandhi’s personal experiences of life to aid in developing a clearer image of his resistance to globalization and urbanization. Gandhi has served as a political leader, the article could form better rhetoric and communication if links were created to comparison between his sides as a political leader and then as a common person so the audience may discover how and what factors from a human side result in sustainable environment and how can human life affect the changes in Earth’s atmosphere and increase in temperature as well.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *